SolrSunriseSecurity CompanyPenetration testing services
Request an authorized web application, external network, or internal network penetration test. A specialist qualifies the objective, boundaries, safety constraints, and deliverables before any proposal or testing begins.
Testing shaped around the question
Every engagement begins with a specific security objective and an authorized boundary. The scope determines which systems, roles, techniques, exclusions, and evidence will produce a useful answer without turning the assessment into an open-ended exercise.
Assess approved pages, APIs, authentication, session handling, authorization, input processing, configuration, and business logic. Human testing follows promising signals, compares user roles, and evaluates the practical impact of weaknesses that automated DAST may not understand.
Best for launches, material changes, customer assurance, and applications with complex workflows.Evaluate authorized public IPs, hosts, services, remote access paths, and exposed infrastructure from an outside perspective. The assessment distinguishes discovery and scanner observations from attack paths a human tester can safely validate.
Best for internet-facing infrastructure, annual assurance, and exposure validation.Examine approved internal systems, identity boundaries, workstations, servers, segmentation, privileges, and reachable paths from an agreed starting position. Safety controls and escalation contacts are defined before access is provided.
Best for testing lateral movement, identity controls, segmentation, and internal resilience.A controlled engagement
Your request gives us a starting point, not permission to test. The engagement moves through explicit checkpoints before any tester touches an in-scope system.
A specialist reviews the request, confirms that a pentest is the right control, and identifies the systems, roles, access, and information needed for accurate scoping.
Identify the system owner, authorized targets, exclusions, escalation contacts, permitted techniques, access model, and testing window.
Agree on objectives, safety constraints, stop conditions, communication, deliverables, commercial terms, and written authorization.
Run human-led testing, communicate urgent observations, deliver reproducible evidence, answer technical questions, and verify agreed fixes.
Evidence that survives the handoff
Automation for coverage. People for depth.
Vulnerability and application scanning provide repeatable checks across many targets. Penetration testing adds a person who can adapt, form hypotheses, combine weaknesses, compare privileges, and follow the application or network toward the outcome that matters.
Run authorized vulnerability and application scans to discover known weakness patterns, watch for exposure changes, evaluate broad technical coverage, and feed a continuous remediation queue.
Explore application vulnerability scanningBring in human testing when the answer depends on business logic, multi-step abuse, authorization between users or tenants, chained findings, or the real impact an attacker could achieve.
Combine recurring automation with focused human depth.Give the owner evidence and a clear fix path, then re-examine the relevant behavior after remediation. A closure record should show what was retested and what result the tester observed.
Explore vulnerability management workflowBefore you request a quote
Exact techniques and deliverables are governed by the approved scope and rules of engagement.
The final scope defines the exact work. A typical engagement includes qualification, written authorization, testing against approved targets, communication for critical observations, executive and technical reporting, remediation guidance, and a retest path for agreed fixes.
Automated scanning is repeatable and broad. A penetration tester can follow business logic, compare roles, chain weaknesses, adapt to what the application or network reveals, and evaluate practical impact. Many teams use scanning continuously and pentesting for periodic depth or high-stakes changes.
Potentially, but only after the system owner approves the target, timing, safety boundaries, exclusions, communication path, and test techniques. A lower environment may be more appropriate when production impact cannot be acceptably controlled.
Start with the assessment type, approximate number of applications, pages, APIs, hosts, or endpoints, the objective, and preferred timing. A specialist will confirm access, complexity, exclusions, deliverables, and authorization before preparing a proposal.
Retest expectations are agreed during scoping. For included findings, a focused retest can verify whether the relevant exposure changed and provide a closure record for the fixes reviewed.
Scoping request
Estimates are fine. A specialist will confirm the boundaries with you before a proposal is prepared. No account required.
Request received
A SolrSunrise specialist will follow up using the contact details you provided. Your reference is pending.
Return to SolrSunrise